Click here to learn more about the experience.
Click here to learn more about the experience.
On Thursday, October 27 we will be conducting our first live event for the Take Time for Your Life experience. Excited to say the least.
Take a look at the video (which contains the wrong date) below to learn more. Hope you can make it!
Have you used your experiences with pain (heartache, disappointment, failure) to build trust with your followers? Do they know where you've hurt?
As crazy as it may seem, it's our experiences with pain that build trust.
It's the "I don't have to look over my shoulder" variety. So many people/clients/organizations are searching for this even if they don't know it.
Show them the way.
I never became self-employed because of some ache to be my own boss or the next producer of a killer app. Far from it, I had a mission and corporate America had no interest or desire to fund it.
Most people I know who are great at entrepreneur pursuits have a mission. I mean they have this burning in them that won't go away. Even after trying to kill it, they continue onto the unknown, scary and sometimes insane world that is the mission.
So in the end self-employment is merely a vehicle.
This past week two big things came down the pike for me. First, Steve Jobs stepped down as CEO of Apple and Andy Frank thanked me for some unintentional advice. Andy's thank you was the bigger of the two. Andy is working on his "thing" and was lamenting the process of incorporating. I told him that only a mission could make it worth the price paid. It was like holding up a mirror to my own face. A gut check with gusto.
I am on a mission.
For clarity, let me explain my thoughts on the difference between the idea and the reality of self-employment:
Needed to get this out, so here are the people/organizations that are inspiring me now:
All of those listed are doing multiple things inside me in this current frame. I created the list to show my gratitude. I sense they probably don't even know the impact given.
So who's inspiring you?
In my post last week on the new net-worth, I challenged you to look at net-worth in a different way. I even went as far as to say your life depends on it (in so many ways).
An important thing to keep in-mind is the currency each of us is given in the following 8 areas. Call it life currency:
The currency is with you all of the time, if you haven't declared bankruptcy in any of the areas yet. The irony is you can invest this currency in any way you like. You can be foolish or wise, greedy or giving the choice is yours.
So what if you you awoke tomorrow and no one was interested in your career currency or your money currency? How would your fair? Could you find any currency in your family account or your physical account?
My words could fly in the face of what you hold dear (like your career or social). And in many facets, you won't get any encouragement from your investment house (as in the money variety) or family. You might get objections like "what about your retirement" or "how are you going to support your wife and kids?" Hopefully, you noticed that I've never advocated you ignore those. I am asking you to do just the opposite.
Pay close attention to each of the 8 areas.
The idea here is to adopt integration-every day. Starting small and moving to the big and great.
The following is a re-post of something I wrote over 3 years ago. Had a conversation yesterday with a peer and we still see way too much of this:
Talked to a friend yesterday who works for a large organization with many deadlines and targets to hit. She's a star in the company's eyes. And like other "stars," she tends to get access to places and people that average performers don't. She takes advantage of the opportunity-in a good way. What's frustrating this star is managment's lack of clarity around directives. Management has taken the approach of "need to know basis." That might work at the CIA, but not in an organization made up of performance-workers.
Funny thing about star performers, they demand clarity. It isn't given often with management.
Why the dichotomy? A languishing leadership/management culture as far as I can see. The company may have a viable product, long-standing customer base, and a model that's effective in good times and bad. But getting managers who understand how to lead great performers is tough. Here are a few reasons:
When managers are vague, it creates an environment of vigilantes. Everyone (star performers and bottom-feeders) wants to take control based on how they need to survive. In many ways, the manager has become nothing more than a body in a suit.
Restoring (assuming it was there some time in the past) clarity is vital. To not to do this would be organizational suicide.
This post will require you to forget the normal definitions and feelings about crime. My play on words for this post require the following context:
Misdemeanors will only create an insignificant interaction with legal authorities. You might even get off with a warning. In the end, your act was more of a blip or blur.
Felonies, on the other hand are serious actions and cause disrupption. Authorities will do all they can to see that something big happens. Proper attention is given and depending on seriousness of the action, in might create widespread interest.
I'm going to give you a compare and contrast illustration from a few areas of life to help:
The big take-away is, blips and blurrs are forgotten and lead to a wasted life. On the other hand, serious actions and disrupptions are remembered and lead to a life well-lived. Which do you prefer?